Monthly Archives: February 2012

Our Ministry- Surprising Global Opportunity

(I originally wrote this article for the blog

In a town across the waters live members of one of the world’s largest unreached people groups. In the past 20 years, their population in this city has grown from about 8,000 to around 60,000. While their home country’s political situation is tumultuous, in this new city there is stability and religious/political freedom, including the freedom for missionaries to preach the Gospel to them. Like many other people groups in large cities, they have clustered in several major neighborhoods and have assimilated in a variety of professions, from doctors to taxi drivers.

This people group is the Bengali. While their homeland is made up of the country of Bangladesh and the bordering Indian states, a high population and good work ethic have enabled them to scatter to other cities around the globe.

The city, however, is not the desert towers of Dubai or the congested streets of London. The waters one must cross to reach these 60,000 Bengali are not the Bay of Bengal or the Pacific Ocean.

These 60,000 members of an unreached people group live here in the United States of America, in New York City, to be precise. The trip across the waters is a plane flight to LaGuardia or a ferry ride across the Hudson or East Rivers.

And in just a few months, Lord willing, my wife and I, along with our 9-month old daughter, will be loading up our family car to make that trip from here in Kansas City and settle into the borough of Queens where about half of these Bengalis live. The twists and turns God used to bring us to this point were not always easy (wanting to go overseas with IMB, health issue making living overseas impossible for the time being) but He has proven his goodness to us throughout. I can still remember my jaw dropping when I learned that one major people group was the Bengali, the people I had lived among for half a year doing a missions apprenticeship as a college student!

Many unreached people groups are in the US, especially in New York City. One of the like-minded people we will be working with in NYC wrote an entire book with pictures and profiles of 82 of these people groups. (available on Amazon or learn more at

We are excited to be able to work with the Bengali of NYC. It will take a lot of work: prayer, language learning, bold evangelism, discipleship. There are many obstacles. While some are suspicious of church plants because of experiences of ”sheep-stealing”, we don’t even have that option as 95% of our people group is Muslim and about 5% are Hindu! That’s not leaving many Bengali Christians left. New York is an expensive place to live and do ministry. Bengalis face temptations on both sides- their cultural religious traditions and the materialistic individualism they find in NYC. Despite these obstacles, we believe that God has brought these people to our shores for a reason. Our vision is to see faithful, reproducing churches of Bengali believers in each of these various neighborhoods in the 5 boroughs of New York City.

If you take a look at the states listed in our SBC Voices blogroll, you will see some states missing. I am hoping to see New York added this June and to use my writing to share about how God is molding, teaching, and using us to share the Gospel among the Bengali people of NYC. I’m a firm supporter of international missions; I wanted to be one for 11 years or so! But it would be irresponsible stewardship of us to completely ignore the mission field God is bringing to our shores. Would you take a moment today to pray for the spread of the Gospel in New York City and among the people groups found therein?

If you would like more information about our ministry or how you or your church can be involved in praying or partnering with us, email me at joshcollins8 AT gmail DOTCOM.

To learn more about SBC work in New York, check out:

Metro New York Baptist Association

Baptist Convention of New York

NAMB’s SendNYC initiative

Categories: NYC Work | Tags: , ,

Were the Apostles Lazy Bookworms?

As we prepare for our move to New York in June, I’ve been reading through Acts a chapter a week. (I did Luke’s Gospel in a similar slow-cooker fashion last year). This week I hit Acts 6, where the early Christians experience their first internal discord that we read about in Acts. Before this, their problems have largely been external persecution. I guess you could count the lies of Ananias and Sapphira as internal, but the Jerusalem church didn’t really have to make any decisions about that problem, other than how many people were needed to carry the bodies out.

But here we find that the Greek-speaking widows are being neglected in the church’s distribution of food. There were some cultural differences between the Jews who were more Hellenized and those who spoke Aramaic. And apparently, these cultural differences led to the Greek-speaking widows getting passed by in support.

The Twelve assemble the church and propose that a group of Spirit-filled, wise men be selected  from the church who can be put in charge of the food and promote unity. This is done, and seven excellent men were chosen.

Some have critiqued the twelve apostles though as being part of the root of this problem. Rather than being involved in the ministry to people, they have isolated themselves in their rooms in devotion to “the Word of God and prayer.” They’re like a pastor who can’t meet with people because he has 40 hours in his sermon prep each week, locked away in his study. Acts 6:2, “It would not be right for us to neglect the ministry of the word of God in order to wait on tables.”, has been interpreted as a pompous elitism from bookish pastors with no heart for service.

 Is this the case though? I don’t think so. Here are a few reasons why:

1)      “The ministry of the Word” would have been very people-centered. In Acts so far, the phrase “the word of God” is primarily used as a summary for all the Christian teaching, specifically the Gospel announcement of Jesus as the crucified and risen Messiah foretold in the Old Testament. So for them, “the ministry of the word” would have included their evangelistic activities in the temple courts (for which they have been imprisoned at various times). Acts 2 also tells us that the early church was devoted to the apostle’s teaching, meeting in various homes day by day. Now, the apostles did not have a written New Testament for these Christians to read. So for the early Christians to be so regularly encountering the apostles’ teaching in homes, the apostles themselves would have been present in the home! Imagine sitting in a house as Peter tells you of the final events of Jesus’ life (including his own denial) or as Bartholomew recounts the feeding of the 5000. “The ministry of the word” would have been a very personal and people-centered activity.

2)      “The ministry of the Word” required a whole lot of work. We don’t know how much access the Twelve had to actual written copies of the Old Testament Scriptures. We do know that only the very wealthy had access to such things. For them to be studying the Old Testament scriptures to learn how better to present Jesus as its fulfillment would require them to memorize various texts beyond what they had learned in synagogue growing up. Whether this involved them reading scrolls provided by a wealthy Christian (perhaps one of the priests who converted- Acts 6:7) or quoting passages among themselves to memorize, we don’t know. And they wouldn’t have a scroll to quote from when they evangelized or taught in the houses. There would be work to memorize these things, especially as they were in Jerusalem where many literate and devout Jews could have refuted them for sloppy teaching. Thinking through the amount of work and study required to preach as they did should keep us from assuming they were too lazy for serving others.

3)      Luke presents their statements as good things.  He calls their work “the ministry (diakonos) of the word.” It is not as if food service is real ministry and Gospel proclamation is subpar, or vice versa. Both are essential ministries of the church, both for its internal unity and external witness. Luke also presents their statements as “pleasing to the whole church.” And to end the story, with the 7 taking over the food distribution and the Apostles focusing on the ministry of word and prayer, Luke reports that the converts multiplied. And many priests were converted at this time. Would the conversion of the priests be directly related to the increased focus of the Apostles on their Word ministry of evangelism and teaching? Either way, Luke wants us to know that this arrangement was a good thing.

I’ve written this post for two reasons. One, there are those who denigrate the evangelism and teaching ministry of the church as less important than “real” ministry like feeding people. Don’t do it! We need those devoted to the ministry of proclaiming the message of God into people’s lives. Two, there are those who would use this text to justify bookish avoidance of people and their problems. Don’t do that! Your teaching will only benefit from dealing with people each week. Encountering non-Christians will make you think about how you present things in a sermon to deal with actual objections people have to the Gospel; praying and counseling believers will force you to practice speaking God’s words into life situations. And both of these are what Acts calls “the ministry of the Word”, not just a pulpit ministry.

Categories: Following Jesus | Tags: , , ,

When Saul Became Paul…

A zealous young Pharisee named Saul, from the city of Tarsus, encounters the risen Messiah Jesus, in a blinding vision. He is converted from killer of Christians to Christian. He no longer goes by the name Saul and changes his name to Paul upon conversion, and becomes the great missionary of early Christianity.

Or so the narrative goes. It was never quite explained to me in Sunday School why the name Paul was more Christian than Saul. (God likes “p” more than “s”? Saul developed a speech impediment when he fell off and could no longer pronounce his name right?) But it was assumed this had something to do with his conversion.

There are a couple problems with that narrative, though. First, Paul most likely had both names his entire life. Saul was his good Jewish name and Paul (Paulus in Latin) would have been part of the Roman trinomenaccompanying his Roman citizenship.

The other problem with that is the Book of Acts itself. Granted, we don’t have a single epistle bearing the authorial introduction for one “Saul of Tarsus” but only the familiar “Paul, an apostle…” But a brief survey of the Saul/Paul’s life in Acts will reveal to us a little more about this name change.

Acts 7:58- Saul stands by holding the garments of those stoning Stephen. (How do you think Luke knew Saul was there? or how he knew Stephen’s speech before the Sanhedrin? I would imagine it was Paul himself years later, perhaps with tears, recounting the final moments of Stephen’s life.)

Acts 9:1-5- Saul encounters Jesus while on the road to Damascus and is confronted by the true Lord, Jesus.

Acts 9:19-30- Saul meets with Barnabas who is willing to risk meeting with this former executioner of Christians to disciple him.

Acts 11:19-26- Saul is brought by Barnabas from Tarsus to Antioch to help lead a growing church of Jews and Gentiles.

Acts 13:1-3 -Barnabas and Saul are commissioned by the Holy Spirit and the church at Antioch to start churches in other cities.

Acts 13:5 -Saul the missionary preaches the Word on Cyprus

Acts 13:6-12-Luke subtly mentions that Saul is also named Paul while recounting the conversion of Sergius Paulus on the island of Cyprus.

Acts 13-28- Saul is called Paul from this point forward in Acts.

What can we draw from this?

Paul’s change of name was not simply related to the fact that he was a Christian. In fact, for years after his conversion, even when Acts was written, he was also known as Saul. Had Luke wanted us to tie Paul’s name change to his conversion, he would have switched names at the point of Paul’s baptism. But apparently he wants us to connect Paul’s name change to a different story altogether, one that occured almost haphazardly on Paul and Barnabas’ first missionary journey. Our narrative should not be “Saul the Pharisee becomes Paul the Christian” but “Saul the Pharisee becomes Saul the Christian missionary, also known as Paul the Christian missionary.”

But still, Luke begins using Paul for the rest of the stories in Acts, with this story on the island of Cyprus being the pivot for Luke’s usage of Paul’s Roman name rather than his Jewish one. Why?

I think this change was a conscious one. A couple things stand out about this location in Acts. First, we meet a proconsul named Sergius Paulus. I can imagine having our character Saul/Paul encounter another character named Paul would be a memorable place for Luke to disclose Paul’s second name. But why would he continue to use the second name? Second, this is Paul’s first recorded missionary work with a Gentile. We know that Peter has already preached to Cornelius in Acts 10, and that Paul himself taught many Greeks at Antioch who were coming to faith in Jesus. But this is our first specific encounter of Paul with a Gentile that Luke recounts, a Gentile who shares Paul’s Roman name. And Saul goes by Paul from this point on. Paul, the one who “became all things to all men”, was willing to be primarily known by his Roman name from here on out as we see in the rest of Acts and the epistles. Perhaps he saw the connection he developed with the proconsul that day on Cyprus, or perhaps he had slowly come to this conclusion that in order for this ex-Pharisee to reach Gentiles with the Gospel, he would exploit every God-given connection with them available. If that meant eating new food, he did so. If that meant working as a tentmaker rather than be paid in some cities, he did so. Even if it meant going by his other name, Paul did so.

What natural ways has God given you and me to connect with people? What interests, skills, family connections might we, like Paul, exploit for the sake of the Gospel? If the difference between an “S” and a “P” was seen by Paul as strategic to the Gospel advancing among the Gentiles, how can we neglect entire areas of our life that God might use for the mission He has called us to?

Categories: Mission Tension | Tags: , , ,

Create a free website or blog at